International Reactions Vary Amid US-Israel Strikes on Iran

The ongoing military conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran intensified over the weekend, drawing varied international responses as combat operations continue into early March 2026.

The crisis erupted on February 28, 2026, when joint US-Israeli strikes targeted Iranian facilities and leadership, resulting in the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and numerous other senior figures.

Iran retaliated with missile and drone attacks on Israel, US forces, and several Gulf states, including the UAE and Qatar, causing explosions in Dubai and Doha, civilian casualties, and widespread disruption to regional airspace and shipping. 

• Global reactions split as US-Israel strikes on Iran escalate conflict
• EU urges restraint while US vows continued military operations
• Oil prices surge amid widening Middle East crisis

The US military reported its first casualties, with three service members killed, and President Donald Trump vowed in statements on March 1 that "combat operations continue at this time in full force, and they will continue until all of our objectives are achieved." He indicated the campaign could last around four weeks, emphasizing strong goals, including preventing Iran's nuclear ambitions and avenging American losses.

In response, Australia explicitly ruled out military involvement on March 2. Foreign Minister Penny Wong stated, "Australia is not central to the issues in the Middle East. We didn't participate in these strikes and we wouldn't anticipate participating in the future." The government is prioritizing civilian support, including assistance for Australians stranded by closed airspace and disrupted flights.

European nations urged de-escalation. On March 1, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, speaking for all 27 member states after an emergency meeting, called for "maximum restraint", protection of civilians and full respect of international law, including the principles of the United Nations Charter, and international humanitarian law. The statement condemned Iran's attacks as "inexcusable" while warning against further escalation that could threaten global stability and key waterways like the Strait of Hormuz.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz advocated for forward-thinking strategy, urging US and European partners to develop a "plan for the day after" in Iran. He outlined goals including regional peace and stability, ending Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs, contributing to a stable Iranian future, and allowing Iranians to "decide their own fate." Merz expressed some reservations about the strikes but stressed cooperation over criticism at this stage.

Also Read: Pragmatist Larijani Emerges as Key Power Broker After Khamenei's Death

The conflict has spiked oil prices, grounded thousands of flights, and raised fears of broader regional involvement, including from Iranian proxies like Hezbollah. As strikes persist, global calls for restraint contrast with US commitments to press on until objectives are met.