South Korea Awaits Verdict in Ex President Yoon Insurrection Case

South Korea is bracing for a court verdict in the South Korea insurrection trial of former president Yoon Suk Yeol, a case that could carry penalties ranging from life imprisonment to death and mark one of the most serious criminal judgments against a former leader in the country’s history. The Yoon Suk Yeol verdict is being closely watched across the region.

The Seoul Central District Court is expected to deliver its Seoul Central District Court ruling on whether Yoon illegally attempted to impose martial law in South Korea in December 2024 during a confrontation with the opposition-controlled National Assembly.

Prosecutors argue that his actions constituted insurrection charges in South Korea, citing orders to deploy security forces and restrict legislative activity as a direct threat to constitutional governance.

• South Korea awaits verdict in former president Yoon insurrection case
• Court ruling may set historic precedent on presidential power
• Verdict seen as major test for South Korean democracy

Yoon was impeached by parliament and formally removed from office in April 2025, an episode now referred to as the Yoon Suk Yeol impeachment, following weeks of unrest and mass demonstrations that triggered a broader South Korea political crisis. He has since remained in detention while standing trial. Prosecutors have sought the death penalty under laws governing rebellion and insurrection, highlighting the severity of the case under death penalty insurrection law, though South Korea has not carried out executions since 1997.

Security has been tightened around the courthouse, with police deployed in large numbers as authorities prepare for demonstrations. Officials have warned that any attempts to disrupt proceedings will be met with firm action, citing concerns about public order and institutional stability.

Yoon has rejected all accusations, arguing that his actions fell within presidential authority and were necessary to resolve legislative paralysis. His defence maintains that the case reflects disputes over executive power in South Korea, rather than criminal intent.

Several former aides have already been convicted in related cases, reinforcing claims that the episode represents a South Korea constitutional crisis. Legal experts say a conviction would almost certainly lead to an appeal, prolonging the legal process.

Also Read: Sara Duterte Enters 2028 Philippine Presidential Race

The verdict is widely seen as a defining South Korea democracy test, with lasting implications for political accountability and the limits of presidential authority.